This Forum is Closed
April 20, 2024, 02:11:20 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: GGF now has a permanent home: http://forum.globalgulag.com
 
  Home Help Search Links Staff List Login Register  

State Nullification: Requisite To Freedom by Chuck Baldwin

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: State Nullification: Requisite To Freedom by Chuck Baldwin  (Read 1433 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Rebelitarian
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 62


View Profile
« on: February 10, 2011, 05:04:11 pm »

State Nullification: Requisite To Freedom
Categories: Archived Columns, Columns by Chuck Baldwin
I was thrilled to see J.B. Williams report in NewsWithViews.com that the State of Montana has a broad-based State nullification bill currently proposed in its legislature. Derek Skees (R-Whitefish) is the State legislator who has introduced this much-needed legislation.

See the story at:

http://www.newswithviews.com:80/JBWilliams/williams130.htm

The fact is, Skees’ State Nullification bill is only one of several outstanding freedom-first bills that is currently before the Montana legislature. I urge readers to go to PolyMontana.com to look at the many other fine pieces of pro-freedom legislation pending in the Montana State legislature:

http://polymontana.com/legislators/freedom-bills/

Unfortunately, one of those very fine bills has already been defeated: the “Sheriffs First” bill sponsored by Senator Greg Hinkle (R-Thompson Falls). This bill is long overdue and absolutely necessary to prevent federal usurpation of State and local law enforcement. That the Montana legislature failed to pass this bill indicates just how necessary it is to elect State legislators who truly understand constitutional government. I urge readers to read the following defense of the Sheriffs First law, written by my son, Constitutional Attorney Tim Baldwin:

http://tinyurl.com/4aclefs

Look through the list of the other freedom bills presently before the Montana State legislature and one will instantly recognize the potential for this State to stand at the “tip of the spear” in the reclamation and restoration of State sovereignty, freedom, and independence. (Plus, it reinforces why my family and I made the life-changing decision to move to this beautiful and wonderful State.)

For example, there is a bill to nullify federal health care laws; a bill to eliminate the misapplication of the 14th amendment to the US Constitution; a bill to nullify the Endangered Species Act; a bill to authorize permit-less Concealed Carry; a bill to transfer management of certain federal lands; a bill to provide the State eminent domain authority for federal lands; and, of course, the Sheriffs First act, which would have required the Sheriff’s authorization for federal law enforcement agencies to conduct arrests, searches, and seizures.

I would dare say: if you are a freedom-minded individual, goose bumps ran up your spine just from reading the above summary. I got goose bumps simply writing about it. Can one imagine the kind of freedom that would be unleashed in this great State should even a handful of these bills actually become law? And think of the numbers of other State legislatures that would quickly follow suit (especially here in the West) should any State legislature pass and a State governor sign these kinds of freedom protections into law!

This is why I keep insisting that, if freedom has a chance to survive in these United States, the American people must get their eyes off of Washington, D.C., and start focusing on their individual states. The authority and power to properly defend liberty has always rested with the states. I’m not saying we should not be concerned about who our US representatives and senators are–or who is elected President. I am saying, however, that freedom will never be restored from inside the Beltway. It is State independence, resolve, and nullification that will ultimately preserve and protect our liberties. And, as the creators of the US Constitution acknowledged, State nullification is absolutely requisite to freedom’s survival.

And, fortunately, Montana is not the only State with freedom-loving men and women in its legislature. I am hearing of lawmakers in states such as Oklahoma and Virginia (and several others) who are introducing similar freedom bills in their respective State legislatures. The question is, as always, will the people of these states get behind their brave legislators and help them get these freedom bills passed? If they are preoccupied with watching the major television network news channels (that focus almost entirely on national and international politics), they will not even know that these freedom bills are being proposed (most local media ignore them, too), and, therefore, will be totally inactive and ineffective in helping to restore the freedoms they claim to love.

I repeat: if freedom is to have a new birth in America, we must stop focusing on Washington, D.C., and start focusing on our individual states! I cannot overstate it: liberty will be won or lost at the State level!

Report Spam   Logged

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Rebelitarian
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 62


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: February 10, 2011, 05:07:18 pm »

http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/?p=3049
Report Spam   Logged
Bad Penny
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 327



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 11, 2011, 02:57:57 am »

Rebelitarian:

Right you are, except that I must point out that, as the Federal government is the creature of the states, what we're really talking about here, very technically, isn't state nullification, but, rather, the withholding of state ratification of Federal initiatives.

This principle must be FIRMLY established before the "Council of Governors" gains traction, as the creation of the 10 FEMA regions represents a blatant effort to replace the several states, which are the progenitors and Constitutional masters of the Federal government, with political subdivisions of the United States which are the creature of the Federal government, responsible only to the Federal government.

Except for this rather abstract point, which I offer as an addition, rather than as a correction, I fully ratify your post.
Report Spam   Logged

Are you taking over?
Or are you taking orders?
I ain't going backwards!
We're going only forwards!

The Clash, White Riot
Rebelitarian
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 62


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 22, 2011, 04:14:53 pm »

In a simplified nutshell the Globalists are making their big push and the states are where Americans will make their final stand.

I hope we do establish a new capitol in Montana under a Ron Paul/Chuck Baldwin Presidency.

This would be so F***ing AWSOME !!!!!!!!!!!!

I can see another civil war break out.
Report Spam   Logged
Bad Penny
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 327



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 22, 2011, 11:08:00 pm »

Why Montana as the location of the new Seat of Government?

And, let's not mention the civil war thing.  We're trying to avoid that, if only to avoid becoming the rulers of a destroyed country.
Report Spam   Logged

Are you taking over?
Or are you taking orders?
I ain't going backwards!
We're going only forwards!

The Clash, White Riot
Rebelitarian
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 62


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 24, 2011, 04:38:46 pm »

Because the Southwest has the most pro-American ideals of what true liberty should be.

We should make a new Federal Disctrict to keep it out of any one state granted.

That and there's plenty of land available.

Also the states can send new representatives and senators.

We could put the new Capitol where Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming meet.
Report Spam   Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
Free SMF Hosting - Create your own Forum

Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy
Page created in 0.056 seconds with 18 queries.