This Forum is Closed
October 20, 2014, 07:27:20 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: GGF now has a permanent home: http://forum.globalgulag.com
 
  Home Help Search Links Staff List Login Register  

What are Suspicious Activity Reports? SARs exposed!

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: What are Suspicious Activity Reports? SARs exposed!  (Read 4423 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
birther truther tenther
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 182


View Profile
« on: December 02, 2010, 01:42:09 am »

What are SARs?

The following retrieved from:
http://www.niem.gov/request/SARInitiativeNSI.pdf




Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting (SAR) Initiative (NSI)NIEM Standards in Action

What Makes an Activity Suspicious?
• A citizen observes or reports to law enforcement authorities that something is alarming, out of the ordinary, or “just not right”
• Law enforcement or government official observes something
• Based on training or experience to recognize behaviors and indicators that are associated with terrorism-related criminal activity
•Knowledge of laws and regulations
•Interactivity with other agencies
•Studies and research done on behaviors leading to crimes and terrorist acts (e.g., LAPD, NCTC, FBI)

What is the Nationwide SAR Initiative (NSI)
•The NSI is based on the ISE-SAR Functional Standard established by the Office of the Program Manager –Information Sharing Environment (PM-ISE)
•The NSI relies upon existing and accepted law enforcement practices―gathering information regarding observed behaviors and incidents associated with crimes
….while being extremely sensitive to privacy concerns
•The NSI establishes a processes and a technology infrastructure whereby information can be shared to detect and prevent criminal activity, including that associated with domestic and international terrorism

What is the Nationwide SAR Initiative (continued)

Key objectives of the NSI
•Ensure that a SAR has been legally gathered and is determined to have a potential nexus with terrorism-related criminal activity
•Ensure that standard policies and procedures are in place to protect citizen privacy and civil liberties
•Support an implementation process that can be accomplished within the agency’s existing framework to gather, process, analyze, and report behaviors and events that are indicative of criminal activity
•Support the institutionalization of standard processes by providing comprehensive SAR training for executives, analysts and street officer personnel
•Establish appropriate technology at participating sites to enable the sharing of terrorism-related SARs across the Information Sharing Environment
•Standardize on NIEM based data exchanges using the LEXS-SR and LEXS-PD standards and the IEPD established by the ISE SAR Functional Standard (FS-200)





NIEM Pilot: ISE-SAR Evaluation Environment
•The ISE-SAR Evaluation Environment (ISE-SAR EE) was established in 2008 to provide an operational NSI infrastructure to enable:
•Operational testing of Common Terrorism Information Sharing Standards (CTISS) and NIEM data exchange standards (LEXS-SR and LEXS-PD)
•Identification of best practices (training, analysis, privacy, technology)
•Effective sharing of SAR data between federal, state and local agencies (14)
•Per PM-ISE guidance the ISE-SAR EE represents a distributed and decentralized solution to allow agencies to locally hold and control SAR data and yet make data easily and securely accessible (viewable) by other authorized law enforcement agencies
•This local repository of suspicious activity reports having a “potential” nexus with terrorism is referred to as an ISE “Shared Space” and collectively as the ISE Shared Spaces
•SAR data in the ISE Shared Spaces is accessible via secure CUI networks by users authorized by the DOJ Trusted Broker technology using a federated search/query tool hosted at www.ncirc.gov

Current ISE-SAR Pilot Status
•Operational Sites
•Florida Department of Law Enforcement
•New York State Intelligence Center
Virginia Fusion Center
•Metropolitan DC Police Department



•Implementation in Progress (completion May 2009)
•Chicago PD             Seattle PD
•Los Angeles PD        Phoenix PD
•Boston PD               Las Vegas PD
•Miami-Dade PD         FBI eGuardian System
•Houston PD             DHS




With all of the frikken acronyms used, makes this presentation almost seem like reading a foreign language.  It's Newspeak at its finest.

Glossary of newspeak acronyms:

ISE = Information Sharing Environment (website: http://www.ise.gov/Pages/NSI.aspx)

NIEM = National Information Exchange Model (website: http://www.niem.gov/)

EE = Evaluation Environment

NSI = National Security Institute = website: http://nsi.org/

NSI = Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting Initiative

LEXS = Logical Entity eXchange Specification (website: http://www.lexs.gov/)

JIEM = Justice Information Exchange Model (website: http://www.it.ojp.gov/default.aspx?area=nationalInitiatives&page=1110)

RISS = Regional Information Sharing Systems (website: http://www.riss.net/)

IEPD = Information Exchange Package Documentation (website: http://www.niem.gov/whatIsAnIepd.php)

SME = Security Management Engineering???

HSIN = Homeland Security Information Network (http://www.dhs.gov/files/programs/gc_1156888108137.shtm)

LEO = Law Enforcement Officer (I call 'em peace officers or public servants)

NCIRC = National Criminal Intelligence Resource Center  (ncirc.gov)

RFC = Request For Comments??? (Learn about it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Request_for_Comments)

JTTF = Joint Terrorism Task Force (http://www.justice.gov/jttf/)

CUI = Controlled Unclassified Information (http://www.archives.gov/cui/)



This one post I did is almost like a semester long class in Criminal justice!!!!
Report Spam   Logged

Social Buttons

birther truther tenther
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 182


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 02, 2010, 01:42:47 am »

A look at the creation of a "snitch culture"


Retrieved from http://www.ise.gov/Pages/NSI.aspx



The Nationwide Suspicious Activity Reporting (SAR) Initiative (NSI) builds on what law enforcement and other agencies have been doing for years—gathering information regarding behaviors and incidents associated with criminal activity—and establishes a standardized process whereby SAR information can be shared among agencies to help detect and prevent terrorism-related criminal activity. [INSERT: See this thread on agency collaboration: http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=187740.0]

In 2008-2009, the PM-ISE evaluated the policies, procedures, and technology concepts needed to implement a unified SAR process across federal, state, and local governments. The results of the ISE-SAR Evaluation Environment, documented in a series of publically available reports, showed that the unified process not only enhanced counter-terrorism efforts, but also strengthened privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties protections. Moreover, although the evaluation environment was focused on SARs that were indicative of terrorism-related crimes, both the steps in the NSI cycle and the data elements in the ISE-SAR Functional Standard are adaptable to other types of criminal behavior.

In March 2010, the Department of Justice established an NSI Office to facilitate the implementation of the NSI across all levels of government and assist participants in adopting compatible processes, policies, and standards that foster broader sharing of SARs, while ensuring that privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties are protected in accordance with local, state, and federal laws and regulations. Updated information on the NSI can be found on their website: http://nsi.ncirc.gov/default.aspx or email nsi@ncirc.gov.

The NSI is one of the ISE’s most significant accomplishments to-date and the best example of the ISE in action: An interrelated set of harmonized policies, mission processes, and systems which leverage ISE core capabilities and enablers to empower the men and women on the frontline to access and share the information they need to keep the country safe.

The role of the PM-ISE is to coordinate and facilitate the development of a network-centric ISE by focusing on standards and architecture, security and access, associated privacy protections, and best practices. The PM-ISE serves as a change agent and center for innovation and discovery in providing ideas, tools, and resources to mission partners who then apply them to their own agencies or communities. In some cases, such as the NSI, the PM-ISE helps sponsor promising mission partner initiatives by providing seed money, subject-matter expertise, or other resources to launch the activity. The aim is always to develop these initiatives in full partnership with mission owners. In addition, as improved business processes and supporting policies and technical solutions are developed and deployed, the PM-ISE helps identify, promote, and spread best practices and, where possible, influences resource allocation decisions to ensure the institutionalization and potential reuse of these mission partner capabilities.



Retrieved from: http://www.mta.info/news/stories/?story=55



If You See Something, Say Something

Over the past eight years, the MTA's "If You See Something, Say Something" campaign has been an integral part of keeping our transit system safe. It is now a key piece of the region's security infrastructure and a simple reminder that we are all the first line of defense. This weekend's events in Times Square underscored the campaign's success in raising public awareness and the importance of remaining vigilant.

The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) launched the now-famous tag line in 2003. It has licensed its use, free of charge, to 54 organizations around the world for use in public awareness campaigns about security.

"Our customers are the first line of defense and the "If You See Something, Say Something" campaign improves customer awareness and provides the ideal outlet for all New Yorkers to get involved," said William A. Morange, the MTA's Director of Security. "This campaign has been extremely successful and illustrates how the MTA continues to work together with the NYPD and other law enforcement agencies to safeguard our city and our transit system."

Among those who use the phrase are Harvard University, Amtrak, NJ Transit and numerous other public transit agencies, the U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, the Maryland Dept. of Natural Resources, which uses it for protecting waterways and reservoirs from terrorist attack, the City of Amsterdam, and three Australian states -- Victoria, Queensland and Western Australia.

In 2008, the campaign was recognized by the American Public Transportation Association for excellence in marketing and communications. It was created and developed by Korey Kay & Partners, the MTA's advertising agency.

The vigilance of all New Yorkers has kept MTA buses, subways, and railroads safe. The MTA thanks our passengers and reminds them to:

    * Be alert to unattended packages.
    * Be wary of suspicious behavior.
    * Take notice of people in bulky or inappropriate clothing.
    * Report exposed wiring or other irregularities.
    * Report anyone tampering with surveillance cameras or entering unauthorized areas.
    * Learn the basics of safe train evacuation

And remember, if you see something, say something. Alert a police officer, MTA employee or call 888-NYC-SAFE (888-692-7233).
Report Spam   Logged
birther truther tenther
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 182


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 02, 2010, 01:43:14 am »

LOL, while researching Suspicious Activity Reports in the DHS power structure, I came across a reporting form for the Internal Revenue Scam.

If you want to be a "snitch" fill out this form and mail it off to the IRS.

http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/ffc109.pdf

It would be funny if a thousand of us filled out this form and put in Rahm Emmanuel.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/rahm-emanuel-doesn%E2%80%99t-pay-taxes-so-why-should-you.html
Report Spam   Logged
birther truther tenther
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 182


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: December 02, 2010, 01:43:50 am »

8 signs of terrorism presentation:

http://info.publicintelligence.net/NJ-SARS.pdf

Quote
Activity or person may not be criminal BUT may be suspicious
Report Spam   Logged
birther truther tenther
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 182


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 02, 2010, 01:50:23 am »

Brief note: As the SPLC-authored DHS reports have attacked Constitutional groups ad nauseum, it makes you quickly realize the "homegrown terrorists" that Janet "Big Sis" Napolitano are talking about are you and me.  Boogeymen al-CIAduh will get'ya, so allow Big Sis to create fusion centers to spy on everyone, and set-up a snitch culture with propaganda campaigns, like the one featured here: http://www.mta.info/news/stories/images/see_something_lg.png




Fusion Centers and SARs Will Help Disrupt Homegrown Terrorists, Says Napolitano

Quote
The theory behind both counterterrorism tactics is that local police officers and first responders know their communities better than anyone in the nation's capitol and thus can spot and report suspicious activity that could portend terrorism, especially as the threat comes from within local communities. They aren't without their critics, however. Civil libertarians see fusion centers and suspicious activity reporting as the foundation for an ever-expanding surveillance state that will continually erode the notion of privacy. Both DHS and DOJ insist that their efforts respect civil liberties, although a string of incidents where law-abiding citizens have been monitored or painted as possible terrorists call such claims into question.

Read rest of article here:
http://www.securitymanagement.com/news/fusion-centers-and-sars-will-help-disrupt-homegrown-terrorists-says-napolitano-007649





Extracted from:
http://hsgac.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Files.View&FileStore_id=8cd9834b-6c0a-4d14-821d-42bfa35e0092

Statement of Janet A. Napolitano
Secretary
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
before
United States Senate
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs
on
Nine Years After 9/11: Confronting the Terrorist Threat to the Homeland
Wednesday, September 22, 2010
342 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington DC

Chairman Lieberman, Senator Collins, and members of the Committee: Thank you for this opportunity to testify on the continuing and evolving terrorist threat to the United States.
Today I would like to highlight the main ways in which the terrorist threat to our country is changing – ways that increasingly challenge law enforcement and the intelligence community. I would also like to highlight some specific – though not exhaustive – ways that the Department of Homeland Security is moving to address this evolving threat.
The Evolving Terrorist Threat to the Homeland
The terrorist threat changes quickly, and we have observed important changes in the threat even since this Committee convened a similar hearing last year. The threat is evolving in several ways that make it more difficult for law enforcement or the intelligence community to detect and disrupt plots.
One overarching theme of this evolution is the diversification of the terrorist threat on many levels. These include the sources of the threat, the methods that terrorists use, and the targets that they seek to attack.
Sources of the threat
It is clear that the threat of al Qaeda-style terrorism is not limited to the al-Qaeda core group, or organizations that have close operational links to al Qaeda. While al Qaeda continues to threaten America directly, it also inspires its affiliates and other groups and individuals who share its violent ideology and seek to attack the United States claiming it is in the name of Islam – a claim that is widely rejected.
Some of these affiliates, like al-Shabaab in Somalia, have not yet attempted to attack the homeland, though al-Shabaab has committed acts of terrorism elsewhere and some al-Shabaab leaders have espoused violent, anti-American beliefs. Other al-Qaeda affiliates have actually attempted to attack the homeland in recent months. These include Tehrik-e Taliban (TTP) and al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) – which, until their respective claims of responsibility for the attempted Times Square and Christmas Day terrorist attacks, had only conducted attacks in their regions.
Homegrown terrorists represent a new and changing facet of the terrorist threat. To be clear, by “homegrown,” I mean terrorist operatives who are U.S. persons, and who were radicalized in the United States and learned terrorist tactics either here or in training camps in places such as the Federally Administered Tribal Areas of Pakistan. Terrorist organizations are increasingly seeking operatives who are familiar with the United States or the West. In their roles as terrorist planners, operational facilitators, and operatives, these individuals improve the terrorist groups’ knowledge of Western and American culture and security practices, which can increase the likelihood that an attempted attack could be successful. In recent attacks, we have also seen the influence of violent extremist messages and propaganda spread by U.S.-born, English-speaking individuals operating from abroad, including the U.S.-born, Yemen-based Anwar al-Awlaki. Skillfully contrived publications, persuasive messages in idiomatic English, and skillful use of the Internet may be helping to increase the number of homegrown violent extremists.
Diversified tactics
Terrorist tactics continue to evolve and diversify. Recent attempted terrorist attacks have proceeded quickly, with less extensive pre-operational planning than previous attempts and with fewer linkages to international terrorist organizations. They have been executed on a smaller scale than the catastrophic attacks of 9/11.
There is a rising threat from attacks that use improvised explosives devices (IEDs), other explosives, and small arms. This type of attack has been common in hotspots around the world for some time, but we have now experienced such attempted attacks in the United States. Other countries, from Afghanistan to Somalia to Russia, have also experienced attacks where small teams of operatives storm a facility using small arms. Unlike large-scale, coordinated, catastrophic attacks, executing smaller-scale attacks requires less planning and fewer pre-operational steps. Accordingly, there are fewer opportunities to detect such an attack before it occurs.
Potential targets
Last, let me address targets. We must recognize that virtually anything is a potential target. Consequently, our thinking needs to be “outside the box” while we simultaneously focus our planning on targets that intelligence forecasts to be most at risk. Many of the targets that terrorists seek to strike are familiar – especially commercial aviation, which continues to be a favored target. Most public places and critical infrastructure face some risk of attack in today’s environment. Potential targets include mass transit and passenger rail, which serve thousands of people every day, operate on predictable schedules, and have many access points, all of which are appealing characteristics to terrorists. We also see a threat to the kinds of places that are easily accessible to the public. Among these kinds of targets, hotels were notably attacked during the Mumbai terrorist attacks of 2008. There also continues to be a general risk to our critical infrastructure such as ports and chemical facilities.
The increasing number of terrorism sources, terrorist tactics, and terrorist targets make it more difficult for law enforcement or the intelligence community to detect and disrupt plots. The threats come from a broader array of groups and regions. It comes from a wider variety of harder-to-detect tactics. And it is aimed at harder-to-secure places than before.
DHS is moving swiftly to address the current threat landscape. Through the state and major urban area fusion centers, we have been working closely with state, local, tribal, and territorial (SLTT) law enforcement in our overall efforts to combat terrorism, because in an environment where operatives may not have close links to international terrorist organizations – and where they may, in fact, be based within this country – these levels of law enforcement may be the first to notice something suspicious. We have established programs that facilitate a strong, two-way flow of threat-related information, where SLTT officials communicate possible threat information to federal officials, and vice-versa. As discussed earlier, pre-operational activity – such as target selection, reconnaissance, and dry runs – may occur over a very short time period, or in open and crowded places. Informing federal authorities of suspicious activities allows this information to be compared with information in other law enforcement and intelligence databases and to be analyzed for trends, increasing the likelihood that an attack can be thwarted. This also allows federal authorities to better inform communities of the threats they face. The nation’s fusion centers have been a hub of these efforts, combined with other initiatives DHS has instituted to better partner with SLTT law enforcement. Today I will focus on a few of these actions.
Providing Law Enforcement Personnel the Information and Resources They Need
Information sharing
In today’s threat environment, preventing terrorist attacks means creating a unified effort across all levels of government, and ensuring that law enforcement officers on the front lines at all levels have everything necessary to do their jobs.
We are strengthening the networks and relationships necessary to get information where it should to be, when it should be there, and in the most useful format. At the heart of this effort are fusion centers, which serve as focal points for information sharing among federal and SLTT law enforcement. Starting with just a handful in 2006, there are 72 fusion centers today. They analyze information and identify trends in order to effectively share timely intelligence with local law enforcement and DHS. In turn, DHS shares this information with others within the Intelligence Community. By doing this, the Department facilitates two-way communication among our federal partners and state and local emergency management and public safety personnel, including the first responders on the ground.
My goal is to make every fusion center a center of analytic excellence that provides useful, actionable information about threats to SLTT law enforcement and first responders. To support this vision, we have deployed experienced DHS intelligence officers to fusion centers across the country. We have provided 64 personnel at last count and are committed to having an officer in each fusion center. We support fusion centers in our grants process and are looking for ways to support them through adding technology and personnel, including the deployment of highly trained experts in critical infrastructure protection. As fusion centers become fully operational, we deploy the Homeland Security Data Network so that fusion center personnel with appropriate federal security clearances have access to classified homeland security threat information.
Strengthening fusion centers is not the only way we are improving the flow and quality of information and getting it to where it needs to be. We are also working closely with the Department of Justice to expand the Suspicious Activity Reporting (SAR) Initiative into a national resource for SLTT law enforcement. As I mentioned earlier, today’s diffuse threat landscape means that a police officer on the beat, rather than an intelligence analyst in Washington, D.C., may have the best opportunity to detect an attack or attack planning. The SAR Initiative creates a standard process for law enforcement in more than two dozen states and cities to identify and report suspicious incidents or behaviors associated with specific threats or terrorism. It makes first responders first preventers, as well. The system allows the information to be shared nationally so that it can be used to identify broader trends. We are working with our partners at DOJ to expand this program to every state to make it as comprehensive and effective as possible. By next month, the system will be implemented in an additional 17 locations in addition to the 12 operational, and will cover nearly 70 percent of the American population. We plan for it to be fully implemented on a national scale by the end of 2011.

Grants and grand guidance
Another important way we push tools and resources from Washington and into local hands is through grants. Currently, state and local governments across America are struggling to pay their bills and fund vital services. As a former two-term Governor, I know the hard budgetary choices they are facing. But it is critical to our national security that local communities maintain and continue to strengthen their public safety capabilities. To help ease the burden on state and local governments, we awarded $3.8 billion in grants this past year to states, cities, law enforcement, and first responders, and are helping localities stretch these dollars even further. We have eliminated red tape by streamlining the grant process. We have expanded grants to fund maintenance and sustainability, enabling local jurisdictions to support previous investments, rather than buying new equipment or technology each year. We have also bolstered first responders across the country by making it easier for fire grants to be put to work quickly and to enable fire departments to rehire laid-off firefighters and protect the jobs of veteran firefighters. Keeping experienced first responders on the job is critical to our ability to recognize threats and take action.
Public awareness
As recent events have underscored, each and every person has a role to play in keeping our communities and country safe. For example, take the New York street vendor who tipped off a policeman about the bombing attempt in Times Square, or the group of passengers on Flight 253 who intervened to stop the bombing attempt on Christmas Day.
That is why we have taken an effective public awareness campaign with a familiar slogan – “If You See Something, Say Something,” developed by New York City's Metropolitan Transit Authority with support from DHS, and are expanding it across the country, throughout various sectors. Over the summer, we launched this campaign in partnership with Amtrak, the general aviation community, and local and regional law enforcement in the National Capital Region and across the Southern states. We are also working with professional and collegiate sports leagues to launch this effort at stadiums across the country this fall.
The goal of the “If You See Something, Say Something” campaign is to raise awareness of potential indicators of terrorism, crime and other threats and emphasize the importance of reporting suspicious activity to law enforcement. We see this as a way both to empower Americans to take part in our nation’s security and to build important relationships between citizens and SLTT law enforcement in order to ensure local authorities have the information they need to stop terrorist attacks.
Empowering Communities and Police to Combat Violence
We also are empowering local jurisdictions and communities to work together to address violent extremism. The potential threat of homegrown violent extremism is very clear. Some two dozen Americans have been arrested on terror charges since 2009. While it is not clear if this represents an actual increase in violent radicalization, versus a rise in the mobilization of previously radicalized individuals, it is nonetheless evident that over the past 12 months, efforts by violent extremist groups and movements to communicate with and recruit individuals within the United States have intensified. And the profiles of Americans who have been arrested on terror charges, or who we know are involved in terrorism overseas, indicate that there is no “typical” profile of a homegrown terrorist. While we work to address violent extremism, we must acknowledge that there is much we do not know about how individuals come to adopt violent extremist beliefs.
All of this was noted in a detailed report by the Bipartisan Policy Center’s National Security Preparedness Group co-chaired by Lee Hamilton and Tom Kean. It is important to emphasize, though, the actions are currently underway to address the threat of homegrown violent extremism, including our regular consultations with international partners. We know that information-driven, community-oriented approaches led by local police departments in close partnership with community members have been very successful in reducing violence in many American communities. The Homeland Security Advisory Council’s (HSAC) Countering Violent Extremism Working Group – comprised of security experts, elected officials, law enforcement leaders, community leaders, and first responders from around the country – has provided DHS with a number of recommendations on how to support local law enforcement and community-based efforts to identify and combat sources of violent extremism.
Based on the HSAC Working Group’s recommendations, and in conjunction with the Major Cities Chiefs Association, the International Association of Chiefs of Police, the Department of Justice, the Counter Terrorism Academy, and the Naval Postgraduate School, we are developing a curriculum for state and local law enforcement focused on community-oriented policing, to enable frontline personnel to identify activities that are indicators of criminal activity and violence. This training will be available through a number of venues, including regional community policing institutes and DHS’ Federal Law Enforcement Training Center.
We are producing a series of unclassified case studies that examine recent incidents involving terrorism. These will inform state and local law enforcement personnel, as well as members of communities, about common behaviors and indicators exhibited by the suspects in these cases. DHS is also creating a series of intelligence products for the fusion centers and law enforcement personnel that will discuss tactics, techniques and plans of terrorist organizations, including the recruitment and training of individuals living in the United States. In addition, DHS is convening a series of regional summits with state and local law enforcement, government, and community leaders this fall to focus on best practices. These summits will allow all participants to provide and receive feedback on successful community-oriented policing and other programs aimed at preventing violence and crime. DHS will gather these case studies and best practices and share them with law enforcement nationwide, employing the widely used platforms that the Department has already established.
Finally, DHS continues to work with the Department of Justice to leverage grant programs to support training and technical assistance for SLTT law enforcement. The Department is working to incorporate community-oriented policing concepts into our broader preparedness efforts. And at the same time – because these new initiatives and policies are inherently relevant to DHS’ local community partnerships – the Department is expanding the cultural training and engagement activities performed by the Office for Civil Rights and Civil Liberties. These activities will help both DHS personnel and SLTT law enforcement to better understand, identify, and mitigate threats to American communities.
Community leaders play a vital role in countering violent extremism. Many have helped disrupt plots and have spoken out against violent extremism. They play a central role in addressing this issue, and we are committed to continuing to work closely with them.
Strengthening Specific Sectors
All of what I have described today helps to create a strong foundation for preventing acts of terrorism. But I would also like to talk about some steps we have taken to address terrorist threats to specific economic sectors. These are hardly the only sectors we are focused upon, but there are a few I would like to highlight for the purpose of this testimony. Commercial aviation
Despite many improvements to aviation security since 9/11 that have made flying very safe, there are still vulnerabilities that need to be addressed. The attempted terrorist attack on Northwest Flight 253, bound to Detroit, on December 25, 2009, illustrated the global nature of the threat to aviation. That incident involved a U.S. plane flying into a U.S. city, but it endangered individuals from at least 17 foreign countries. The alleged attacker, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, is a Nigerian citizen educated in the United Kingdom. He received training in terrorist tactics in Yemen, purchased his ticket in Ghana, and flew from Nigeria to Amsterdam before departing for Detroit. And as Canadian officials have pointed out, the plane was over Canadian airspace at the time of the incident.
After this attempted terrorist attack, the U.S. government moved quickly to do more to strengthen security. We took immediate steps to bolster passenger screening, while addressing larger systemic issues on a global scale. I personally traveled to numerous foreign capitals in the aftermath of the attack to work with our allies to ensure our international aviation security efforts were stronger, better coordinated, and redesigned to meet the current threat environment. Since January, we have worked closely with the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), the United Nations body responsible for air transport, on five regional aviation security summits that I have participated in along with elected leaders, security ministers, and airline officials. We have also worked closely with U.S. and international airline and airport trade associations and airline CEOs on a coordinated, international approach to enhancing aviation security.
Next week, at the ICAO General Assembly meeting, we expect the international community to ratify four key elements of global aviation security. These elements are: developing and deploying new security technologies that better detect dangerous materials; strengthening security measures and standards for airport inspections and cargo screening; enhancing information sharing about threats between countries within the international aviation system; and coordinating international technical assistance for the deployment of improved technologies. These reforms represent a historic advancement for the safety and security of air travel.
DHS has coupled these international efforts with significant advances in domestic aviation security. We have deployed additional behavior detection officers, air marshals, and explosives-detection canine teams, among other measures, to airports across the country. Through the President’s fiscal year 2011 budget request and the Recovery Act, we accelerated the purchase of 1,000 Advanced Imaging Technology machines for deployment to airports around the country, and are purchasing and deploying more portable explosive detection machines, Advanced Technology x-ray systems, and bottled liquid scanners. The United States implemented new, enhanced security measures for all air carriers with international flights to the United States that use real-time, threat-based intelligence to better mitigate the evolving terrorist threats. In June, DHS achieved a major aviation security milestone called for in the 9/11 Commission Report by assuming responsibility for terrorist watchlist screening of all passengers on domestic and international flights on U.S. airlines.
Surface transportation
I would also like to discuss specific actions we have taken to strengthen security for surface transportation, such as passenger rail and mass transit. Many of the steps I have already described are especially important in that environment. We conducted the initial launch of the national “If You See Something, Say Something” campaign at Penn Station in New York, in conjunction with Amtrak. The SAR Initiative is also geared toward detecting signs of terrorism in public places like train stations, buses, or rail cars. This initiative includes the Amtrak Police Department as a law enforcement partner and allows Amtrak officers to use the upgraded reporting system to refer suspicious activity reports to DHS and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. This is in addition to the intelligence sharing that the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) conducts with Amtrak on an ongoing basis, and the information-sharing work done by the Public Transportation Information Sharing Analysis Center. The expansion of the SAR Initiative will continue to work directly to secure rail transportation.
There are also a number of operational activities underway focused on surface transportation. We are continuing to augment local anti-terrorism efforts by deploying TSA officers at train stations to screen passengers with Amtrak police, and in New York subway stations to work alongside New York and MTA Police. TSA special operation teams, known as VIPR teams, work with local partners to support several thousand operations every year. We are moving forward on risk-based implementation plans for each of the 20 recommendations (of which DHS has the lead on 19) made in the Surface Transportation Security Assessment, released in April as part of an Administration-wide effort to address surface transportation security. We are also in the rulemaking process to require background checks and security training for public transit employees, and to require vulnerability assessments and security plans for high-risk public transportation agencies, railroads, and bus operators. All of these will help to address a landscape where the threats to these systems are distinct. Conclusion
The terrorist threat against the United States continues to evolve in ways that present more complicated and dangerous challenges than we have faced in the past. We cannot guarantee that there will never be another terrorist attack, and we cannot seal our country under a glass dome. But we can do everything in our power to prevent attacks, confront the terrorist threat head-on, and secure our country.
The efforts that I have described today are only a small part of the work that the hundreds of thousands of men and women, at DHS and at law enforcement agencies across the country, do every day to secure our nation. And I want to emphasize that the Department is focused on many other threats, as well – in particular, the growing threat to our cyber networks and the threat from chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear weapons. In everything I have described today – and in everything we do to combat terrorism – DHS is focused on providing those on the front lines with the technology, training, and information they need to do their jobs and keep our country safe.
Chairman Lieberman, Senator Collins, and members of the Committee: Thank you for inviting me to testify today. I can now answer any questions you may have.




(what I highlighted in blue made me LOL)

Report Spam   Logged
birther truther tenther
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 182


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: December 02, 2010, 01:51:00 am »

Retrieved From:
http://www.cisco.com/web/strategy/docs/gov/COPSSCommandandControlExec_wp.pdf



Excerpt:

Cisco Open Platform for Safety and Security: Understand the Command and Control Architecture Building Block

What You Will Learn
The Cisco Open Platform for Safety and Security is an architecture framework for building solutions to prevent, prepare
for, respond to, and recover from incidents. The framework comprises six building blocks: Command and Control,
Mission-Critical Network, Incident Collaboration, Sensing and Actuation, Mobile Force, and Citizen-Authority Interaction.
This white paper is intended for organizations planning investments in safety and security technologies and for solutions
providers. It focuses on the Command and Control architecture building block and explains the trend towards Fusion
Centers.
This building block provides the following capabilities:
• Intelligence and process management
• Mission-critical applications
• Infrastructure management and monitoring

The Role of Command and Control in Safety and Security
Traditionally, public safety agencies each maintained their own control rooms, which were not connected to the others. Agencies exchanged information only by phone.

The need for interagency collaboration during emergency response has increased. Therefore, traditional Command and
Control rooms are undergoing a transformation to become Fusion Centers, so called because they fuse information from
multiple sources to create actionable intelligence.

A fusion center is a “system of systems.” That is, each participating agency maintains its own systems (knowledge
databases, sensors, strategic and operation centers), and takes advantage of open interfaces to connect them into a
shared, virtual system. Having each agency maintain its own systems avoids the economic and technology risks of a
single “super system,” with its potential for failure. The advantages of virtualizing Command and Control functions:
• Facilitating collaboration during major incidents with the goal of improving decision processes and accelerating response
• Enabling individual agencies to retain ownership of and access to their own resources
• Enabling agencies to manage their own information and user spaces
• Providing a shared infrastructure, reducing the costs for the individual agencies
• Making emergency personnel’s location irrelevant by giving them secure mobile access to information and services from any
location with a wireless connection

The Command and Control architecture building block provides the functions that the crisis management team needs:
up-to-date situational awareness, actionable intelligence, and decision support tools. Figure 3 shows the role of the
Command and Control architecture building block in the Cisco Open Platform for Safety and Security.

Figure 3 The Command and Control Architecture Building Block




Read rest of the "white paper" here:
http://www.cisco.com/web/strategy/docs/gov/COPSSCommandandControlExec_wp.pdf








Report Spam   Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
Free SMF Hosting - Create your own Forum

Powered by SMF | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Page created in 0.468 seconds with 22 queries.