This Forum is Closed
October 25, 2020, 05:52:37 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: GGF now has a permanent home:
  Home Help Search Links Staff List Login Register  

Bernard Eastlund patents ...

Pages: [1]   Go Down
Author Topic: Bernard Eastlund patents ...  (Read 1554 times)
Offline Offline

Posts: 27

View Profile
« on: August 22, 2010, 09:42:48 pm »

PATENTS-Benard Eastlund
1. Bernard Eastlund et al, "High Intensity Discharge Lamp with single Crystal Sapphire
Envelope, " U. S. Patent 6,992,445, January 31, 2006.

2. Bernard Eastlund et al, "Sapphire high intensity discharge projector lamp", U. S. Patent 6,661,174.
December 9, 2003.

3. Bernard Eastlund et al, "High Intensity Discharge Lamp with Single Crystal Sapphire Envelope",
U. S. Patent 6,652,334, November 25, 2003.

4. Bernard Eastlund et al, "Microwave energy ink drying method", U. S. Patent 6,508,550,
January 21, 2003.

5.  Bernard J. Eastlund et al, "High Intensity Discharge Lamp with Single Crystal  
Sapphire Envelope," U. S. Patent 6,483,237, November 19, 2002.

6.  Bernard J. Eastlund, et al, "Microwave Applicator for  Drying Sheet Material,"
U. S. Patent 6,444,964, September 3, 2002.

7.  Bernard J. Eastlund, et al, "Microwave Energy Ink Drying System", U. S. Patent
 6,425,663, July 30, 2002.

8.   Bernard J. Eastlund, "Sapphire High Intensity Discharge Projector Lamp,"
 U.S. Patent 6,414,436, July 2, 2002.

9.   Bernard J. Eastlund and Andrew Bushnell, "Method and Apparatus Utilizing
 Microwaves to Enhance Electrode Arc Lamp Emission Spectra," U. S. Patent
 6,087,783, July 11, 2000.

10.  Bernard J. Eastlund, "Method and Apparatus for Improving the Energy
Efficiency for Separating the Elements in a Complex Substance such as
Radioactive Waste with a Large Volume Plasma Processor", U. S. Patent No.
5,868,909, Feb. 29, 1999.

11. Bernard J. Eastlund, "Method and Apparatus for Ionizing All the elements in a
Complex Substance such as Radioactive Waste and Separating Some of the
elements from the Other Elements", U. S. Patent No. 5,681,434, Oct. 28, 1997.

12.  Bernard J. Eastlund, "Method and Apparatus for a Large Volume Plasma
Processor That Can Utilize Any Feedstock Material", U. S. Patent No. 5,630,880,

13.  Bernard J. Eastlund, "Method for Producing a Shell of Relativistic Particles at
an Altitude Above the Earth's Surface", U. S. Patent No. 5,038,664, 1991.

14.  B. J. Eastlund, K. J. Schmitt, D. C. Anderson, "Tubing Collar", U. S. Patent
  No. 4,861,074, 1989

15.  B. J. Eastlund, K. J. Schmitt, R. M. Bass, J. M. Harrison, "Method and System
  for Introducing Electric Current Into a Well", U. S. Patent No. 4,716,960, 1988.

16.  Bernard J. Eastlund, Simon Ramo, "Method and Apparatus for Creating an       
  Artificial Electron Cyclotron Heating Region of Plasma", U. S. Patent No.
 4,712,155, 1988.

17.  Bernard J. Eastlund, "Method and Apparatus for Altering a Region in the
  Earth's Magnetosphere", U. S. Patent No. 4,686,605, 1987.

18.  Bernard J. Eastlund, Kenneth J. Schmitt, R. M. Bass, "Well Heater",
  U. S. Patent No. 4,678,034, 1987.

19.  B. J. Eastlund, W. C. Couch, M. G. Ury, "Method and Apparatus for Curing
Three Dimensional Objects Without Rotation", U. S. Patent No. 4,208,587, 1980.

20.  M. G. Ury, B. J. Eastlund, R. Bradon, C. Wood, " Microwave Generated
Radiation Apparatus", U. S. Patent No. 4,042,850, 1977.

21.  B. J. Eastlund, "Non-Symmetrical Reflector for Radiation Curing",
  U. S. Patent No. 3,983,089, 1976.

22.  B. J. Eastlund, D. M. Spero, M. G. Ury, "Method and Apparatus for Generating
  Electromagnetic Radiation", U. S. Patent No. 3, 911,318, 1975.

23.  B. J. Eastlund, D. M. Spero, M. G. Ury, "Generation of Ultraviolet Light With
  Microwave Plasmas", U. S. Patent No. 3, 872, 349, 1975.

1. Bernard Eastlund et al, "Reflector for UV Curing Systems, 20050115498
2. Bernard Eastlund et al, "UV Flux Multiplication System for Sterilizing air, medical devices and
other materials, 20040166018



Eastlund combined the ideas of MEV electrons in space with the technology to generate MEV electrons 
using electromagnetic waves to create the idea of a missile shield and other applications of MEV 
electrons by inventing a large antenna array in Alaska to project RF electromagnetic waves to intersect
with the earth's geomagnetic field at high altitude. The subsequent relativistic electrons would destroy 
enemy missiles if they intersected with missile trajectories. See HAARPMEVELECTRONS.

The patents are:

"Method for Producing a Shell of Relativistic Particles at an Altitude Above the Earths Surface"
Bernard J. Eastlund inventor, US Patent Number: 5,038,664 Issue Date: 8/13/91,Assignee: APTI, Inc.

"Method and Apparatus For Altering a Region in the Earth's Atmosphere, Ionosphere, and/or 
Magnetosphere" Bernard J. Eastlund inventor, US Patent Number: 4,686,605 Issue Date: 8/11/87
Assignee: APTI, Inc.

"Method and Apparatus For Creating an Artificial Electron Cyclotron Heating Region of Plasma"
Bernard J. Eastlund and Simon Ramo inventors, Patent Number: 4,712,155 Issue Date: 1/28/85
Assignee: APTI, Inc.

Note that all of these patents were filed before any subcontractors were involved with the project.
The patent issued in 1991 had been held up because it was classified as secret for 5 years.
MEV ELECTRONS the HAARP system, or a system like it only larger, could accelerate copius 
numbers of MEV electrons along magnetic field lines in the atmosphere, then, in our opinion, this could 
be the greatest threat to modern military satellite technology. A geosynchronous satellite could be 
eliminated within 20 minutes. There is some indication that other countries, such as China are working 
on such technologies. See HAARPMEVELECTRONS


The first stage of HAARP had 950 KW and it was recently increased to 3600 KW or 3.6 Megawatts. The power 
level in terms of what is needed to create MEV electrons is still low. The theory indicates at least 0.5 watt/ cm^2
is needed at 100 km altitude. The 3.6 Megawatt HAARP has just 0.21 microwatts/cm^2 at 2.8 MHz.
It is possible that the HAARP might be capable of pulsed operation in which the energy is stored for a 
second or more and then released in a short millisecond burst. This could increase the flux at altitude 
by a factor 1000 to 10,000. This would increase the flux to 2.1 milliwatts/cm^2. The HIPAS system in 
Alaska ran in a pulsed mode in the 1980's. Also, we have heard that the recent upgrade actually cost 
around $200 million. This could be because a pulsed capability was installed.
It is possible to create a "lens" in the ionosphere short of the desirable electron acceleration point and 
focus the power on a much smaller area than assumed in the HAARP Calculator available on the web. 
Such a method of operation could increase the flux a factor of 10 or more. If both pulsed and lensing 
were used, the flux would be very close to the 0.5 watts/cm^2 in the theory.
The acceleration of electrons in the ionosphere to MEV energies was considered the most important 
application of the Eastlund ARCO patents when they were under development. It may still be one of 
the DOD priorities. This facility and the ARCO patents have been made public for a number of years.
Any country could build one. HAARP is not built with overly sophisticated technology. The technology 
is easily available all over the world. Any country that builds a facility capable of missile defense or 
ASAT applications such as envisioned in the original ARCO work, could severely destabilize the 
world's military situation.


The core hypothesis underlying the ARCO patents was to generate copious amounts of MEV electrons along 
magnetic field lines above the earth's surface as shown above. Resonance energy can be applied many ways to 
objects. Wind was the force that created a resonance effect and toppled the Tacoma narrows bridge in 1940. 
 A resonant heating method of creating MEV electrons using RF waves was developed and exploited by the 
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Subsequent plasma devices have generated MEV electrons in the 
laboratory with resonant heating. A figure from the "Large Helical Device" project depicts such electrons 
confined by a magnetic field.
The ARCO patents by Dr. Eastlund, hypothesized a large phased array antenna located in Alaska with its RF 
energy focused at altitudes 100km or more above the earth. The system is illustrated at the top of the page. 
The frequency was t chosen to be in the 1-3 MHz range to create an electron resonance heating that would 
create MEV electrons along the magnetic field lines. The RF beam is shown in yellow in the figure. The heating 
process is depicted as a helix along a magnetic field line. The electrons spiral along the field line with 
increasingly large orbits as their energy increases. MEV electrons are formed and a magnetic mirror force 
pushes the electrons away from the earth along the magnetic field lines. When such electrons impinge on a 
missile warhead or a satellite, they are buried in the material and heat components. In the case of a missile 
warhead, this can lead to destruction, in the case of a satellite, it can make the satellite inoperative.

The first DOD contract regarding the ARCO patents by Eastlund was from DARPA and was entitled "The 
Alaska North Slope Electric Missile Shield", contract No. DAAHD1-86-C-0420. The objective was to determine 
the feasibility of generating the MEV electrons and determining the feasibility of the applications. A summary of 
the work performed is available as a paper entitled "Applications of In Situ Generated Relativistic Electrons in 
the Ionosphere", by Dr. Bernard J. Eastlund, December 13, 1990. ESEC Technical Report 136. Distribution of 
this paper was authorized by DARPA in 1990. 
Eastlund's Patent 5,038,664 estimated 
electron acceleration power requirement of 
0.1 to 1 watt/cm2 at 250 KM.

This hypothesis was verified theoretically by 
Menyuk et al, Phys. Rev. Letters, Vol. 58, 
Number 20, May 18, 1987  who were 
supported by the “Alaskan North Slope 
Electric Missile Shield” contract. The paper
concludes that 0.5 watt/cm2 at 130 KM 
could accelerate ambient electrons to 5 
Dr. Eastlund was the principal investigator 
on the contract.


China radar at South Pole could sabotage U.S. Spy satellites, February 1, 2006

Beijing announced plans last week to build a high-frequency radar on the South Pole. Analysts say 
the radar could be used to disrupt U.S. Intelligence satellites.
The radar will be built at China’s Zhongshan Station, where Beijing has set up of a space 
environment lab.

The station will consist of 20 antenna units, including 16 units for the main antenna and four for the 
auxiliary antenna. Each antenna is 20 meters high. The high-frequency radar can detect 
ionospheric convection within a range of 3,000 kilometers. Chinese officials told Xinhua the station 
would be used to measure the polar space environment.


The science of weather modification is in its infancy. When the ARCO patents were written in 1984, the only 
scientific approach was salting clouds with silver iodide. One of the reasons weather modification is not a science 
is that scientists have made what they considered to be reasonable assessments of the relative size of forcing 
technologies (such as wind generators, microwave heaters, or explosions) and determined that the large size of 
weather systems make it useless to attempt to change weather patterns with human intervention.
In U. S. Patent 4,712,155 Eastlund states,"In one embodiment of the invention, electron cyclotron resonance 
heating is carried out in the selected region at sufficient power levels to allow the plasma to generate a mirror 
force which forces the charged electrons of the altered plasma upward along the force line to an altitude which is 
higher than the original altitude. As the plasma moves upward, other particles from the atmosphere at the same 
altitude as the selected region move horizontally into the region to replace the rising plasma and to form new 
plasma. The kinetic energy developed by said other particles as they move horizontally is on the same order of 
magnitude of as the total zonal kinetic energy of stratospheric winds known to exist at altitudes equal to the region 
being altered. Since there is evidence that these stratospheric winds may be linked to certain weather patterns on 
earth, the present method may be used to affect similar patterns."

In U. S. Patent 4,686,605 Eastlund states, "Weather modification is possible by, for example, altering upper 
atmosphere wind patterns or altering solar absorption patterns by constructing one or more plumes of 
atmospheric particles which will act as a lens or focusing device."

Gravity waves have received much attention over the last 5 years as an important initiator or cause of some 
severe weather phenomena.
Report Spam   Logged


Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Hero Member
Offline Offline

Posts: 1242

Routing out & defeating the globalist pigs

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: October 30, 2010, 01:59:00 pm »

United States Patent  4,686,605

Eastlund    August 11, 1987

Method and apparatus for altering a region in the earth's atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere


A method and apparatus for altering at least one selected region which normally exists above the earth's surface. The region is excited by electron cyclotron resonance heating to thereby increase its charged particle density. In one embodiment, circularly polarized electromagnetic radiation is transmitted upward in a direction substantially parallel to and along a field line which extends through the region of plasma to be altered. The radiation is transmitted at a frequency which excites electron cyclotron resonance to heat and accelerate the charged particles. This increase in energy can cause ionization of neutral particles which are then absorbed as part of the region thereby increasing the charged particle density of the region.


Inventors:    Eastlund; Bernard J. (Spring, TX)
Assignee:    APTI, Inc. (Los Angeles, CA)
Appl. No.:    06/690,333
Filed:    January 10, 1985

Current U.S. Class:    361/231 ; 244/158.1; 380/59; 89/1.11

Current International Class:    H05H 1/02 (20060101); H05H 1/18 (20060101); F41G 7/20 (20060101); F41G 7/22 (20060101); F41H 13/00 (20060101); H01Q 1/36 (20060101); H05B 006/64 (); H05C 003/00 (); H05H 001/46 ()

Field of Search:    361/230,231 244/158R 376/100 89/1.11 380/59

References Cited [Referenced By]

Other References

Liberty Magazine, (2/35) p. 7 N. Tesla. .
New York Times (9/22/40) Section 2, p. 7 W. L. Laurence. .
New York Times (12/8/15) p. 8 Col. 3..

Primary Examiner: Cangialosi; Salvatore
Attorney, Agent or Firm: MacDonald; Roderick W.


I claim:

1. A method for altering at least one region normally existing above the earth's surface with electromagnetic radiation using naturally-occurring and diverging magnetic field lines of the earth [causes heating in the upper atmosphere]comprising transmitting first electromagnetic radiation at a frequency between 20 and 7200 kHz from the earth's surface, said transmitting being conducted essentially at the outset of transmission substantially parallel to and along at least one of said field lines, adjusting the frequency of said first radiation to a value which will excite electron cyclotron resonance at an initial elevation at least 50 km above the earth's surface[excited region can extend from the ground up given enough sources], whereby in the region in which said electron cyclotron resonance takes place heating, further ionization, and movement of both charged and neutral particles is effected, said cyclotron resonance excitation of said region is continued until the electron concentration of said region reaches a value of at least 10.sup.6 per cubic centimeter and has an ion energy of at least 2 ev.

2. The method of claim 1 including the step of providing artificial particles in said at least one region which are excited by said electron cyclotron resonance. [many regions is possible given multiple energy sources]

3. The method of claim 2 wherein said artificial particles are provided by injecting same into said at least one region from an orbiting satellite. [many satellites can be used to create complex systems]

4. The method of claim 1 wherein said threshold excitation of electron cyclotron resonance is about 1 watt per cubic centimeter and is sufficient to cause movement of a plasma region along said diverging magnetic field lines to an altitude higher than the altitude at which said excitation was initiated. [induces energy flow upward]

5. The method of claim 4 wherein said rising plasma region pulls with it a substantial portion of neutral particles of the atmosphere which exist in or near said plasma region. [actual flow of atmosphere upwards occurs.]

6. The method of claim 1 wherein there is provided at least one separate source of second electromagnetic radiation, said second radiation having at least one frequency different from said first radiation[different frequencies stack to create complex resonant signature with widely variable properties], impinging said at least one second radiation on said region while said region is undergoing electron cyclotron resonance excitation caused by said first radiation.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein said second radiation has a frequency which is absorbed by said region.[one frequency allows another to resonate in the region, which allows another, etc]

8. The method of claim 6 wherein said region is plasma in the ionosphere and said second radiation excites plasma waves within said ionosphere. [waves carry energy from area to another]

9. The method of claim 8 wherein said electron concentration reaches a value of at least 10.sup.12 per cubic centimeter. [technical jargon]

10. The method of claim 8 wherein said excitation of electron cyclotron resonance is initially carried out within the ionosphere and is continued for a time sufficient to allow said region to rise above said ionosphere. [rising atmosphere creates a lower pressure area below it]

11. The method of claim 1 wherein said excitation of electron cyclotron resonance is carried out above about 500 kilometers and for a time of from 0.1 to 1200 seconds such that multiple heating of said plasma region is achieved by means of stochastic heating in the magnetosphere. [the momentum from said energy waves causes heating, which causes the rising, which causes the low pressure]

12. The method of claim 1 wherein said first electromagnetic radiation is right hand circularly polarized in the northern hemisphere and left hand circularly polarized in the southern hemisphere. [where the natural magnetic convergences occur at ground level]

13. The method of claim 1 wherein said electromagnetic radiation is generated at the site of a naturally-occurring hydrocarbon fuel source[burned to power generators at ground level], said fuel source being located in at least one of northerly or southerly magnetic latitudes.

14. The method of claim 13 wherein said fuel source is natural gas and electricity for generating said electromagnetic radiation is obtained by burning said natural gas in at least one of magnetohydrodynamic, gas turbine, fuel cell, and EGD electric generators located at the site where said natural gas naturally occurs in the earth.

15. The method of claim 14 wherein said site of natural gas is within the magnetic latitudes that encompass Alaska.
[Alaskan HAARP array can allegedly use up to 3 billion watts of power]


Click HERE for the rest of the Patent.


My take:

The patent describes a method for stacking waves that excite the magnetosphere, ionosphere, AND atmosphere by causing upward plasma flows resulting in atmospheric uplifting, or low pressure areas.

These low pressure areas are refilled with air from surrounding atmosphere causing wind at the lower levels of the atmosphere.

Atmospheric flow is weather.

This IS weather manipulation technology.

Arrays of generators could be used to create large high pressure areas by flowing air in from all directions to said area.

High pressure areas (denser air) holds exponentially more water per degree celcius (clouds form at a much higher water density in high pressure areas).

Water density at high pressure (temperature) can not get high enough to form clouds, so maximum solar absorption occurs.

The claims of weather weapons being used in Russia are certainly plausible given this quick bit of research into the technology behind HAARP.

I don't know how one would go about detecting and observing all of the frequencies used, and subsequent phenomena that results from each system of frequencies.

You would think that there would be infrared signatures of the rising plasma waves, and patterns of these, forming systems of flow.

I have heard of certain frequencies in the radio range being picked up on shortwave.  This only a very small spectrum of the total systems being created by HAARP.

Where is the infrared, where is the visible light emission proof of such manipulation actually occurring?

Given the explanation of the patent, I would say the effects being alleged in Russia would be plausible given many satellite arrays.

But again, where is the proof of these arrays?

Superconductive generators in the frigid vaccum of space could surely create some impressive energy output.

In the words of Mythbusters:  PLAUSIBLE!


In the summer of 1998 (July or August) I was fishing at a high elevation mountain lake and stayed over night.

After dark, from approximately 11pm to 2am there was a spectacular pulsating light pattern covering the entire sky from horizon to horizon to horizon.

It looked like a pulsating electric spiderweb pulsing purples, reds, and greens.

It went on for hours, there was at least 50 other people at the campsites around Bear Lake  (Approximately 15km SW of Kelowna, BC) that night.

I would testify on my honor in court to what I saw that night.

Having browsed this patent, I believe this is what I saw that night.

I live too far south in Canada (just north of the US border in Central British Columbia) for Northern Lights to encompass the entire sky from north to south.  They only appear in the north, and never the entire sky, and never pulsating spiderweb cellular like patterns.

I searched for it on the Internet when I got home and there was not any news about what we saw.

One thing about the Okanagan Valley:  One of the largest ground level magnetic convergences on Earth occurs right here.

Excellent job xereau! Cool
Report Spam   Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
Free SMF Hosting - Create your own Forum

Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy
Page created in 0.139 seconds with 18 queries.