This Forum is Closed
November 23, 2020, 10:05:56 pm
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: GGF now has a permanent home: http://forum.globalgulag.com
 
  Home Help Search Links Staff List Login Register  

BIRMINGHAM UK; PEOPLE AND COUNCIL. YOU NEED TO FOLLOW THE SCOTTISH LEGAL EXAMPLE

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: BIRMINGHAM UK; PEOPLE AND COUNCIL. YOU NEED TO FOLLOW THE SCOTTISH LEGAL EXAMPLE  (Read 354 times)
Jonnie Goodboy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 833


The Gulag Archipelago, - had 'Paradise Islands'.


View Profile
« on: April 21, 2012, 12:10:39 pm »

IT IS the serious objective opinion of this writer that fluoridation of Birmingham and Solihull's water supplies has been maliciously intentional and is now being used as part of the greater 'experiment' in an extensible SCIENTIFICALLY supported POLITICAL campaign to test new social-policy ideas on a long-term and heavily fluoridated populus. The objective: - To Test level of reactions or changes in measurable 'resilience' of the Public to such political suggestions or changes, following years of neurotoxic-poisoning and hightened carcinogen risk, by forced, that is unmandated fluoridation of these towns/areas' domestic water-supplies.

http://www.ukcaf.org/files/legal_analysis_of_fluoridation_in_eu_-_updated_14t.doc

The foundation of the British and Irish Governments’ policy to impose fluoridation is the claim that it does not constitute public medication. In Scotland, this has been rejected; the practice was confirmed as being a medicinal intervention by Lord Jauncy:

(P.370) "Fluoride is intended to produce a positive effect on the body of the consumer after ingestion. Thus the water instead of being the object of treatment becomes the means whereby fluoride is carried into the consumer's body to effect a result which could also be achieved by the consumption of fluoride pills or of food and drink containing high levels of fluoride. . . It would necessarily involve a restriction on the freedom of choice of the individual who would have little alternative but to consume the fluoridated water whether he liked it or not.".

In this case, it was ruled that  fluoridation was ultra vires the remit of the water supplier, and consequently it is no longer practiced in Scotland. This interpretation appears not to be accepted by the health sector in England, however, and this part of the judgment is invariably ignored by proponents of fluoridation.

http://www.ukcaf.org/files/legal_analysis_of_fluoridation_in_eu_-_updated_14t.doc

See also the thousands of anti-fluoride, albeit rather intellectual aprisals of the risks available online.
and ... http://www.ukcaf.org/oshlack_v_rous_water_-_preliminary_ruling.html

« Last Edit: April 21, 2012, 12:13:52 pm by Jonnie Goodboy » Report Spam   Logged


"When the righteous become many, the people rejoice; but when anyone wicked bears rule, the people sigh".
— Prov 29:2

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter



Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
Free SMF Hosting - Create your own Forum

Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines
Privacy Policy
Page created in 0.096 seconds with 16 queries.